Selected Work
The Truth About Executive Coaching
Executive coaching is most valuable when it improves judgment and behavior—not when it creates a permanent coaching dependency.
By Rob Denker · rd&partners
For more than two decades, executive coaching was a central part of my professional work. During that time I came to believe that much of the conventional conversation about coaching misses the point.
The purpose of executive coaching is not to create a better coaching experience. It is to create a better executive.
That sounds obvious, but it changes how the work should be evaluated.
Coaching has value only when something important becomes different after the conversation.
Insight is not the same as change
Executives can leave a conversation with greater self-awareness and still behave exactly as they did before. Understanding why someone avoids conflict, delegates poorly or dominates meetings may be useful. But organizations experience behavior, not insight.
The real question is whether the executive does something differently when the next consequential moment arrives.
The organization is part of the client
Executive coaching can become too private. Confidentiality matters, but the executive does not operate in isolation. The organization is investing time, money and opportunity in the leader’s effectiveness.
Meaningful development therefore has to connect individual change with business and organizational outcomes. What should colleagues experience differently? What decision should improve? What behavior needs to become visible?
Coaching should not become dependency
A strong coach does not try to become indispensable. The objective should be to improve the executive’s capacity to think, decide and act without requiring the coach’s presence.
That principle is one reason my work has evolved toward strategic advisory. Experienced executives often do not need a continuing development program. They need independent perspective at particular moments of consequence.
What remains true
Despite the changing language around coaching, several principles remain durable: candor matters, trust matters, behavior matters, and results matter.
The best conversations help executives confront something they have avoided, see something they have missed or act on something they already know but have not yet done.
Whether we call that coaching, counsel or strategic advisory is less important than the outcome.
The standard should remain the same: Did the conversation help the leader become more effective where effectiveness actually matters?